20th Nov 2012 at 10:10 | By Collin Roth
Left-Wing Group Attempts To Silence Milwaukee Talk Radio
By Collin Roth
On Tuesday, Sue Wilson of the Media Action Center filed a complaint with the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) to have the licenses of two Milwaukee radio stations stripped for what Wilson calls “private censorship” of “publicly owned airwaves.” According to a Tuesday press release, the Media Action Center accuses WTMJ and WISN of “subsidizing the Walker campaign with an estimated $1 million dollars in airtime” due to conservative programming.
Wilson claims:
This, the challenge asserts, amounts to private censorship, which violates the First Amendment rights of those in the community who are denied access to the scarce publicly owned airwaves during campaigns. It further states the stations willfully have violated existing FCC rules about comparable time, citing legal opinions from the Wisconsin Broadcasters’ Association.
Wilson, the founder of the Media Action Center, has travelled around the country advocating that the media licenses of conservative talk radio stations be challenged with the FCC. Wilson was in Wisconsin in the Fall of 2011 showing her documentary Broadcast Blues, that explains, advocates, and outlines the precise tactics she is now employing against WTMJ and WISN.
Of course Sue Wilson is not really in search of objectivity. At a viewing of her documentary in Mequon last Fall, Wilson described conservative talk radio as “Fascist” and “a cancer eating this country alive.”
Earlier this year, Sue Wilson filed a similar complaint ahead of the June 5 Recall election. The complaint was evidently unsuccessful.
Related Articles | You may also like
Discussion | 95 Comments
Leave a Comment
Your reply will be added to the comment above (Below any other replies to this comment) -
Barlowmaker said
Nov 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM
Typical liberal hag.
Kenny Trump said
Nov 20, 2012 at 7:57 PM
The liberal hack on TMJ after the Packer post game show is about as good as the liberals can do, and that guy is on thin ice due to nil ratings. Who really wants to listen to that schlock anyway. I have better things to do, like clean my grout…
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 10:45 AM
Collin, thank you for writing this piece.
If you read the legal complaint to the FCC at http://www.mediaactioncenter.net , or this piece on Huffington Post, http://huff.to/mW3OIu , you will find that I am not a proponent of the Fairness Doctrine. I hope you will spend a bit of time on this, this is not good sound bite material. If you do you will see that I am not trying to silence Talk Radio, instead I am trying to prevent Talk Radio from silencing a good portion of the community.
Milo _nine said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:49 PM
I’m for the Fairness Doctrine, or anything else that will limit RW Propaganda designed to hoodwink the Rank & File Republicans. BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY!
right is right said
Nov 20, 2012 at 8:35 PM
Sue, if you think the left is being silenced because the right has two stations out of 50, you’re seriously incapable of rational thought.
Tim Ondercin said
Nov 24, 2012 at 6:14 AM
Let’s look at this from a fairness stand point.
Conservative talk radio only corrects a small portion
of the media bias the left has.
Charie said
Nov 24, 2012 at 9:06 PM
You call it silencing a good portion of the community. I call our effort a transgression of these two radio station’s employees First Amendment rights.
There is no one stopping people from listening to their radio shows and they’re welcome to get their own radio stations and say what they wish politically. It doesn’t stop any other Liberal hosts. However, hardly anyone listens to them because most of them are so vile, who would want to? If the FCC gives credence to your claims I’ll know they’re probably mostly Madison Liberals..
Jonny said
Nov 20, 2012 at 11:17 AM
Ohh Sue stay the hell out of Wisconsin!
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:48 PM
you are a political hack trying to silence something you disagree with. Stay the hell out of our state, and while you are at move to some third world country. There, I am sure you will find, your twisted, moronic sense of reality to be just as perverse
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:40 PM
Jonny, I was invited to Wisconsin. Luckily it is a big state!
Stella said
Nov 21, 2012 at 4:37 AM
Great! Now your invitation is expired. M.Y.O.B California needs you now. They’re a big state too and most appreciate your views.
Rick Gullickson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM
And Sly is immune from any liability? Don’t think so. Get this radical left wing liberal piece of crap the hell off the planet.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 1:30 PM
Fair enough. Monitor Sly (during campaigns, that’s the only time we have real standing,) and prove your point.
None of this is about GOP or Dems, it is about re-creating real discussion on our radio airwaves during campaigns. Let us enhance, rather than detract, from Free Speech for all.
Sue S said
Nov 22, 2012 at 9:26 AM
Looks like it worked! Slyme got the boot yesterday! Life is good!
Jeff K. said
Nov 20, 2012 at 2:41 PM
Sue, talk radio in Milwuakee lets liberal and conservatives call in on the subject. It is not the fault of the host that liberal callers are unable to offer any coherent rebuttal to the subject being discussed.
Rick Gullickson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 8:40 PM
I listen to Charlie and Sly. Like night and day. I DO NOT hear the vile on Charlie’s show. Sorry, that’s just the way it is. Free speech does bring out a contrast.
elsie thompson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 10:09 PM
sue wilson, you are full of b.s. you know “recreating real discussion” is not what you want. that’s just the smoke screen of your true intention. so stay out of wi.
Badgerlvr said
Nov 23, 2012 at 8:26 AM
The Slymster getting the boot….best Thanksgiving ever!
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 3:00 PM
Jeff, I would think you are correct. But our monitoring showed that the hosts only take a minute or two of callers, and even then they are overshadowed by the hosts. Also please realize that the talkers have screeners who only let those callers on who make the hosts look smart. This from a former WTMJ News Director: http://archive.truthout.org/111708E
Corey said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:30 PM
You are so full of it your eyes are brown.
John W said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:24 PM
Sue, you simply aim to silence the truth.
Go away. We’re asking nicely.
John Schiesser said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:54 PM
Sue both WISN and WTMJ allow liberal and conservatives on the air, if you do go to Madison and listen to the liberal stations you DO NOT hear a conservative on the air, will you go try and silence those stations like you are trying to silence these two. Or because they are left leaning like you are, you will ignore the fact that they are liberal speak all day long.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:29 PM
John, how can more speech on the air, not less, possibly silence the truth?
Bob B said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:29 PM
Sue, Tom Barrett regularly turned down invitations to appear on Sykes show. I’m sure Belling and Sykes both have pretty good records of when Democratic candidates were invited, and declined, to appear on their shows. The fact they wouldn’t go on the air with either Sykes or Belling and attempt to defend their stands on issues says more about the candidates and less about the stations.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:52 PM
Bob, that may well be true. But when dozens of Barrett supporters wrote into the station, asking for time to counter the many guests who were effectively surrogates of the Walker campaign, they were denied any time at all. That is the basis of our complaint.
Air Time isn't a Right said
Nov 20, 2012 at 6:33 PM
Those that wish to express differing opinions than what is offered from these two stations and their hosts, are free to start up their own radio station and host whomever they wish and speak about whatever they wish. There is nothing stopping them from doing that or expressing their opinions through other avenues. Maybe start thinking about these stations as one of the few avenues available to conservatives and others to express THEIR free speech.
You mentioned above that you were invited to Wisconsin. Who invited you and why would they ask you only to monitor two stations in Milwaukee?
Dave F. said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:31 PM
Sue. Go get a life. This country is based on free speech. Except obviously when a slimy liberal doesn’t like it. I don’t see you trying to silence MSNBC, ABC, CBS, and every other obvious liberal pandering news outlet.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:55 PM
Dave, why are you so intent on silencing anything but right-wing views from the airwaves we ALL own? We all don’t own Msnbc or FOX, that’s private enterprise. We DO own CBS and ABC local stations, and if you don’t like what they are doing, prove it and complain to them and the FCC. It’s your right!
Dave F. said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:27 PM
Sue. Do you own WTMJ radio? I didn’t think so. Now go away…. your arguments are so hollow you are looking quite pathetic. Just because YOU have a right to do something doesn’t make it right. The far out wackos like you and the people from PETA and any number of other groups just serve to make people with common sense fight for their rights even harder. You are just soooooo much smarter than everyone here aren’t you??
Sandy said
Nov 20, 2012 at 7:22 PM
No one is denied access. It is a conservative station. Never has that fact been hidden. Have you tried to pull the licenses of MSNBC and the other Lib MSM? Of course not. Just tune in somewhere else.I prefer the truth
Tom M said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM
Sue, go get a real job and stop living off the taxpayers.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:56 PM
Living off the taxpayers? Oh, please, start with a fact if you are going to argue.
Kurt G said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:36 PM
Funny thing is, Sue would not be making anything out of this if it was a liberal radio station. Why are there hardly any liberal radio stations?? because nobody listens to them, Air America is proof of this. I listen to both stations in Milwaukee, and I know that both conservative AND liberal politicians are more then welcome to call in, not there fault that the liberal politicians refuse to call. Time to just admit your bias Sue
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:57 PM
Kurt, I would make something out of this if it were a liberal station. It’s just that Conservatives have SO many more stations, about 20 to 1, that it is much easier to make the case highlighting Conservative bias. But the rules affect either side, just the way it should be.
Corey said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:37 PM
Sue, then I would encourage you to start your own Radio program and pitch it to any station. I would be happy to listen to you on the radio. If your argument is that we have more stations the same can be said for all media…especially most newspapers and news broadcast (TV).
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:48 PM
Thanks, Corey, you are very kind. I used to do radio, I may again one day. For now, I’m just trying to bring this country back to the good old days when we debated instead of having shouting matches.
I am unsure what you mean by “we have more stations the same can be said for all media…especially most newspapers and news broadcast (TV).” ??
Stella said
Nov 21, 2012 at 5:17 AM
The good old days with debate? During the Walker campaign and the Walker recall, Liberal callers were on the air just screaming their lungs out to the talk show hosts about their rhetoric theories! I’m sure you can get access to the tapes of Vicki McKenna getting attacked on the air and threatened personally by some demented left wing nuts! Are you investigating those? It seems your intent is to give aggressive nut case listeners the freedom to publically abuse the hosts putting them in harms way to publically/vocally be degrated! A few “letters” show up on your desk from these crazies and now you jump to protecting them over the professionals trying to do their job?
Sue Wilson said
Nov 21, 2012 at 2:20 PM
Actually, we do have tapes of all the shows during the Walker recall campaign period. Vicki didn’t take many callers at all.
Charie said
Nov 24, 2012 at 10:42 PM
Sue, do you describe ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NY Times, WaPo, LATimes, Chicago Trib, HuffPo, Daily KOS, DU, Mother Jones,Salon, et al? I’m going to jump in first and say you’ll say describe the first 9 as unbiased and the last 5 as slightly left-leaning. Most of us would describe the first bunch as left leaning and the rest hard Left. The NY Times holds a special place, because I think Pinch and his editors need to be in jail for treason.
J.B. said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:37 PM
Sue Wilson, quit being a sore winner already. Wow. Complain, whine, moan, wah wah wah!!
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM
J.B., you do realize that this started in May, and the petitions to deny were filed Nov. 1, before the election, don’t you? Or haven’t you actually read them?
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:03 PM
no you wouldn’t. Don’t lie! Sly is one of the most hateful people on the airwaves, his rhetoric is an example of what is wrong with this country. Well that and people like you, who have nothing to do, but silence those with whom you disagree.
Jebidiah said
Nov 20, 2012 at 4:47 PM
I suppose the same should be done to MSNBC (and the milwaukee journal sentinel) then since they didn’t report any negative news about Obama during the last several weeks of the election. The left wants total control over everything. Socialism is soon to follow. It’s a free market let different ideas compete. Sue you would do better by starting a competing show or network with another point of view. Why don’t you do this??
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:12 PM
Mike, you do yourself a disservice and everyone else on this thread by calling me a liar. You cannot maintain a cogent argument so you resort to name calling. I tell the truth, I stick to facts. Methinks you have been listening to too much talk radio!
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM
wow be careful your bias is showing. Why do you think there is a 20:1 ratio? My guess, because no one wants to listen to a bunch of liberals, spewing their hatred, and angst.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM
We can have different theories about the 20 to 1 ratio. That’s not bias, that’s a fact. But existing stations do not get to use the radio microphones to exclusively support one political party, that’s a law that just needs to be enforced. Rule of law! Yey!
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:18 PM
methinks you are a liar and ignorant fool. That is not name calling but fact. Only a moron would miss your obvious bias, yet yo deny it. therefore you are a liar
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:01 PM
Jebidiah, there are no more radio frequencies available in the U.S.. Zip. Nada. That’s the point, there can be no competition amongst stations, only ideas.
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:16 PM
So i assume you will be targeting Sly as well? Nope cause he is on your side. Just admit your bias, we’ll get along better, and you won’t come off as such an ignorant fool
craig said
Nov 20, 2012 at 6:14 PM
Have you listened to any of the public radio shows in this state? While traveling I used to tune them in. I stopped because it was always the same thing. When a caller calls to rant about the Governor or to praise Obama he can go on for minutes without interuption even when repeating himself over and over. When someone calls to rebut or to offer a differing opinion, the announcer cuts them off in less than a minute to go to a public service announcement or to tell us what is on later today. When they come back, we get to listen to another liberal rant. I’ve taken to listening to recorded books instead.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 6:39 PM
Honestly, Craig, then you should document this and complain directly to local NPR management. NPR, because it receives public funding, still has to comply with rules similar to the Fairness Doctrine, meaning something like equal time for opposing viewpoints. My local NPR station is very careful to present both sides, but they are all run individually, they just take national programming from NPR. So do what I’m doing in the commercial sphere, and have your say! (The NPR rock is easier to move than this one.)
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:14 PM
24 PM on 08/27/2011
The Right has a monopoly on hate. The Left are just whimps.
Permalink | Share it
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Sue Wilson
Broadcast Blues Director, Media Action Center fndr
441 Fans
04:39 PM on 08/27/2011
It’s sure felt that way, hasn’t it?
But I am no wimp, and I’ll be leading the charge in Wisconsin next month to take back our public airwaves for the entire public.
You madam are a liar!! you are a left wing hack and on one of the artcles you cited you admit your bias. Keep up the personal attacks though, it is all you have once the truth starts getting out about you. You are a disgrace. But entertaining nonetheless
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:18 PM
Mike, show me one place I have ever lied. Can’t do it, can you? And you say I engage in personal attacks? Look in the mirror. Or get a talk radio show, you’d be good at it.
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 6:54 PM
You ought to crawl back under that rocked you climbed out from. If you want to gain credibility, go after sly and the other uber liberal biased networks in Wi. You obviously have an anti conservative agenda, and anyone with a 1st grade education can see it.
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:20 PM
I do not have to look in the mirror, IAM WITHOUT QUESTION attacking you personally. You are an ignorant fool and a liar. You do not go after sly for his support of everything left, but you attack the right, Then you deny you are biased but wanting fairness. UMM i do not think so. You are a liar, and worse yet, a child for you can not admit that you have been found out
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:24 PM
What is the definition of insanity? Oh yeah! doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Epic fail in June Epic fail again
jeremy said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:25 PM
Sue,
If you truley believe in free speech then you should go after the real media problem… msnbc, cnn, abc, and the other media outlets that only push their liberal agenda.
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:26 PM
Sue Wilson, a political hack for all seasons.
Bob B said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:28 PM
Sue, I guess the best thing would be for the folks on the left to become better at selling their ideas on their own talk radio stations. Air America had George Soro’s money (for a while) and Al Franken’s name, but couldn’t gain an audience. Maybe it’s the message?
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:33 PM
I guess it’s that I’m a little older than some, and I remember a time when we actually put two people on the air of differing viewpoints and let them debate. Those days are gone, I guess. But it still doesn’t mean that because some giant corporation like Clear Channel got their hands on a license to broadcast, they get to be exclusive cheerleaders for only one side during campaigns. Fairness is not a popularity contest.
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 5:30 PM
You say you are not biased, but want equal airtime for both parties, yet you do nothing about Sly. There is your proof Sue, you are indeed intentionally being deceptive about your true motives. Therefore you are indeed factually a liar. Live with it, there are worse things to be
MAC founder, Sue Wilson who filed the complaint stated, “The stations are acting in an egregious manner by intentionally promoting only one political party on the radio during the Walker campaign. The radio airwaves are the public airwaves, not the Republican airwaves, and this activity violates FCC political rules.”
It is interesting that Wilson should make such claims, when radio personalities Sly Sylvester of Madison, and Earl Ingram of Milwaukee radio fame dedicate large portions of their broadcasts to endorsing Democratic candidates and furthering the agenda of the Left. In 2011, Sly Sylvester bashed Lt. Governor Rebecca Kleefisch on her record with Wisconsin jobs, going as far as joking about her fight with colon cancer, and making derogatory comments about her path to office.
In addition, Sly openly endorses both Barrett and Mitchell for office, dedicating large portions of time to support their campaigns, as well as highlighting his personal involvement with labor organizations and activism, as displayed through 27 days of workers rally coverage on his website. It is quite curious, albeit hypocritical, that Sue Wilson and MAC choose to overlook “dominance in air-time” when the perpetrators are Democrats or liberals.
This complaint seems to be nothing more than an attack on conservative media personalities, and their right to free speech. With the recall less than a week away, Wisconsin is undergoing some of the most rigorous political discourse it has seen in decades. Any attempt to stifle this discussion would simply be a disservice to voters, and an obstruction to free speech.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 6:48 PM
Mike wrote: “Sly openly endorses both Barrett and Mitchell for office, dedicating large portions of time to support their campaigns.”
If Sly is doing this over the air (not just on the website,) it’s wrong, and I will go after the station airing him. But you will have to help. If you are willing to go back to the podcasts, (the last election is fine, any 60 days prior to an election,) and document just those statements where he specifically endorsing candidates, in writing and a copy of the audio, then I will add Sly to the formal complaint we have made to the FCC, which is still pending. (It is too late to modify the license challenges being discussed here; the last date we could challenge licenses in Wisconsin – for the next eight years – was November 1, the date we filed at the FCC.)
Mary Fulwiler said
Nov 20, 2012 at 6:42 PM
Funny how you never addressed the questions posed to you about CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS AND NBC news and their very obvious left slant shoveling the left wing agenda down our throats. Why is that Sue? You are a total hypocrite whining about the airwaves but no complaints about the tv stations. Hmmm, it’s hypocrites like you that are ruining this country. Please go crawl in a hole and stay there.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 6:50 PM
Mary, I’ll repeat exactly what I wrote above, had you taken the time to read it: “Dave, why are you so intent on silencing anything but right-wing views from the airwaves we ALL own? We all don’t own Msnbc or FOX, that’s private enterprise. We DO own CBS and ABC local stations, and if you don’t like what they are doing, prove it and complain to them and the FCC. It’s your right!”
Mike said
Nov 20, 2012 at 6:58 PM
Why would I do that Sue? Sly can promote any candidate he so chooses, I do not care it is a free country. You however, know damn well he has done it, and continues to do it. yet you ignore this, because he supports your whacked out view of the world.
Dave F. said
Nov 20, 2012 at 7:00 PM
Sue. Your reasoning that Msnbc or Fox is fine with whatever they want to say whereas CBS, ABC etc is not because they use public airwaves is lame at best. It’s 2012, Public airwaves are far from the only way of getting out information or ideas. Very, very weak. You are a very simple, one track minded individual who wants nothing but to force everyone else to your way of thinking. There is and has been lots of liberal talk shows on public airwaves. But, as a typical hypocritical liberal, you have made the CHOICE to ignore them and just go after those programs or stations that you don’t agree with. You are laughable. Now go away and go protest Christmas or something.
BobbyG said
Nov 20, 2012 at 8:31 PM
Mary: There is no “left slant” in corporate-owned media. Nor any “liberal bias.” There’s nothing “left” nor “liberal” about the giant corporations that dominate the global economy.
Sheesh. Where have you been living the last 40 years, that you don’t know this?
R Bryce said
Nov 20, 2012 at 6:54 PM
Wow – at least mediatrackers isn’t totally making crap up. (Accusation about man being beaten for being a gay Republican) Nice to see that they’re back to just trying to slant stories.
As usual, they don’t understand the real story.
Sikma needs to get out of the Sykes closet.
BobbyG said
Nov 20, 2012 at 8:28 PM
I totally support the work of Sue Wilson trying to enforce the Zapple Doctrine. Not only WTMJ and WISN, but more so on the thoroughly reactionary stations owned by Duke Wright’s media empire “Midwest Communications.”
Sue is way more charitable to you reactionaries than I’d ever be. We radicals in Wisconsin would like to see your licenses to broadcast your reactionary propaganda completely yanked, and thrown back into a pool of frequencies available to future bidders who can offer:
Genuine community broadcasting. People like Sykes, McKenna, Bader, Limbaugh, Hannity, “Michael Savage” and Mark Levin can go and do as you rednecks like to yell at unemployed vets from the cab of your public-subsidized giant pickup trucks: “Get a job, hey!”
Corey said
Nov 20, 2012 at 9:06 PM
A little Wine with your cheese? After all, we are from Wisconsin. It’s not enough you have the propaganda from TV and Newspapers is it? Why do you think we have conservative talk radio Bobby? If you can figure that out you’re not as ignorant as you write.
right is right said
Nov 20, 2012 at 8:39 PM
I think it’s so precious that Sue is here trying to shout down anyone who disagrees with her. George Soros must pay her a nice sum.
Patricia Johnson said
Nov 20, 2012 at 10:10 PM
She sounds like a nut case. Don’t worry WTMJ – we will keep listening and supporting your advertisers.
Tim G. said
Nov 20, 2012 at 11:01 PM
How’s Air America doing????
Stella said
Nov 21, 2012 at 5:22 AM
I wanna know what happened in Bangazi!
fedupwithmadison said
Nov 21, 2012 at 11:48 AM
Sue do you even understand free enterprise? The stations are here to make money for their stake holders or owners. If they felt they could do it with a liberal show, they would jump on the opportunity. Don’t blame the station because no one wants to listen to the liberal pap. Just look at the ratings for CNN. What ever happened to Air America. The liberals were given the opportunity but could not make it in the real world.
Now on to your “fact”. 20:1 Bias – Where’s the data for this “fact”. It is made up in your mind because you don’t understand how more people accept and are willing to listen to the conservative message.
Here’s a little homework for you Sue. Pick any 10 of the items in this list (http://www.westernjournalism.com/top-50-examples-liberal-media-bias/) and explain how these are not liberal bias. You can say – oh that’s just another Right wing site. Well here’s your opportunity to tell us how they are wrong.
Sue Wilson said
Nov 21, 2012 at 2:37 PM
Liberal stations giving airtime in the 60 days prior to elections to Democrats without allowing and Republicans on the air is just as wrong as the other way around. This is not about money, and the stations are free to do as they wish all year round, except in that critical campaign period. Luckily, the rules, once enforced by the FCC, will apply evenly to both sides!
fedupwithmadison said
Nov 26, 2012 at 5:47 AM
So Sue – Not up for the challenge I see. Won’t answer the question posed to you. Deflection is a nice tactic but it will not work here. Defend your side against the rebuttal argument that has been made here about the rest of the bias media and then we can have a discussion.
Ralph Peters Jr. said
Nov 21, 2012 at 2:33 PM
Comparable time? Has Ms. Wilson listened to public radio or television lately? These stations actually take take dollars to support a liberal worldview that would not be supported in the private market. At least the stations she mentions are privately funded and aren’t forcing her to support them. Just another example of a liberal cry baby.
Rick Gullickson said
Nov 21, 2012 at 3:00 PM
I guess Sly’s liability has run amuck. Poof and he is gone. Charlie and other fine conservative talk show hosts will be around for a long time. The timing couldn’t have been better.
Saul Alinsky said
Nov 21, 2012 at 8:00 PM
Marxist Sue has as much credibility as Segway Boy
Libsrlooney said
Nov 22, 2012 at 6:50 AM
What is a Sue Wilson? “Sly” is off the the air! Christmas is here early.
Sue S said
Nov 22, 2012 at 9:30 AM
The rude, pathetic, lying leftwing loon Sly is off the air! My wish was granted! He was such a nasty, ugly personality and very mean to women. Guess he got what he deserved.
Other Side said
Nov 22, 2012 at 11:40 PM
@Sue Wilson: I admire your bravery and tenacity.
Sue's Ugly said
Nov 23, 2012 at 5:42 AM
Does anyone seriously think this is not really about an ugly frumpy middle-aged lady desperate to get attention? Sue looks like she has Down Syndrome with that fat face
Other Side said
Nov 23, 2012 at 5:46 AM
Well, wasn’t that special. Some deep-seated anger issues methinks.
Sue's Ugly said
Nov 23, 2012 at 2:31 PM
right- Sue obviously does have anger issues over her mongoloid head which causes her to seek validation from self-centered welfare types
Rick Gullickson said
Nov 23, 2012 at 2:49 PM
To Sue’s ugly – leave her alone and quit acting like a radical lefty. I happen to think she is quite attractive and certainally has a right to her opinion.
Other Side said
Nov 24, 2012 at 3:46 PM
Wasn’t referring to Sue.
You know, there is therapy as an option because the only ugliness I see is coming from Ugly Sue. Speaking of: You must also have self hatred issue to refer to yourself in such a sad manner.
tom murphy said
Nov 23, 2012 at 2:57 PM
Sue Wilson, whoever she may be, should not be allowed arbitrarilly, capriciously and unilaterally to decide you can’t score a touchdown from the 50-yardline simply because it’s the first quarter.
Other Side said
Nov 24, 2012 at 3:49 PM
Meant to reply above.
Sue's cucumber said
Nov 24, 2012 at 4:22 PM
I wonder if fat-faced Sue is a 60 year-old virgin
fedupwithmadison said
Nov 26, 2012 at 5:52 AM
That comment is not necessary! Let’s stick to the true argument. Sue says right wing stations should be more balanced. We say the rest of the media is so biased that she can’t even see it. She has given in a little on the Sly argument so she is not totally a lost cause. But once she answers to the rest of the media bias then we can have a true discussion. I’m not holding my breath because the deprogramming process can take a long time.
Sue's balloon head said
Nov 26, 2012 at 10:27 AM
The thing that needs to be balanced is Sue’s neurosis. She wants attention. She identifies with the left because she thinks frumpy ugly middle-aged hags like her are cheaated by the successful people
steve said
Nov 26, 2012 at 11:24 PM
I’m just tired of people faking that they are sad when people are dead. (laughter) I want to say something, and make it real clear…I will never urinate on her grave. (laughter) I’m gonna pour Round-Up on her grave and I’ll tell you why I’m gonna pour Round-Up on her grave. (Laughter) I’m gonna pour Round-Up on her grave so theres no chance that she ever comes back to life! And I can kill her like the weed that he was. (Laughter)
I’ wish she was dead! sound familar sue????
steve said
Nov 26, 2012 at 11:25 PM
I’m just tired of people faking that they are sad when people are dead. (laughter) I want to say something, and make it real clear…I will never urinate on her grave. (laughter) I’m gonna pour Round-Up on her grave and I’ll tell you why I’m gonna pour Round-Up on her grave. (Laughter) I’m gonna pour Round-Up on her grave so theres no chance that she ever comes back to life! And I can kill her like the weed that he was. (Laughter)
I’ wish she was dead! ring a bell??? sue????