7 Comments

4th Jan 2013 at 15:42 | By

Wisconsin Energy Company To Cut Jobs After Heavy Handed EPA Settlement

By Collin Roth

On Friday, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a proposed settlement with the Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (WPS) that will force the company to pay a civil penalty of $1.2 million, invest $300 million in pollution control technology, and will be forced to spend $6 million on “environmental mitigation projects.” The heavy-handed EPA decision prompted a statement from the Northern Wisconsin energy company claiming “the settlement along with current economic conditions will likely lead to employee staff reductions within its energy supply operations area.”

The EPA alleges that two WPS coal-fired power plants in Wausau and Green Bay were in violation of the Clean Air Act and the settlement with WPS is “part of a national enforcement initiative to control harmful emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act’s New Source Review requirements.”

According to the energy company:

The EPA filed a Notice of Violation against WPS in November 2009 alleging that the utility had not obtained the proper air permits for improvements it made to electric generating units to ensure electric reliability as far back as 1994. WPS does not admit any wrongdoing.

“We acted then using what we believed to be the proper process for making the improvements,” said Terry Jensky, WPS Vice President of Generation Assets. “Many utilities across the country followed the same procedures and they have or are now facing similar action from the EPA.”

In the settlement, WPS agreed to retire, refuel or repower its coal-fired Weston Plant units 1 & 2 (near Wausau, WI), as well as Pulliam Plant units 5 & 6 in Green Bay. The deadline for completing the activities is June 1, 2015. All of these actions are consistent with our evolving generation strategy as we align our portfolio to the best interests of our customers and other stakeholders.

The settlement included a provision for WPS to install its previously announced innovative ReACT™ environmental controls at its Weston 3 generator (321 megawatts). The system will reduce emissions of several pollutants and will position the unit to be in compliance with future EPA regulations. The ReACT™ installation will be the first commercial application of this technology in the United States. After detailed review and analysis, WPS opted to move forward with ReACT™ in advance of the settlement.

In addition to the civil penalty and the investment of $300 million in pollution control technology that WPS claims they were already in the process of installing, WPS must pay $6 million for “environmental mitigation projects.” According to the EPA, WPS will have to pay $250,000 each to the U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service, pay to enhance existing wind and hydroelectric facilities in Wisconsin, fund a wood-stove change out program, and development of a community manure digester. Remaining funds could be tasked towards natural gas and hybrid fleet replacements or the installation of solar panels on public buildings.

The Green Bay headquartered Wisconsin Public Service Corporation serves 441,000 electric customers and 319,000 natural gas customers in Wisconsin and Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The EPA’s settlement with the energy company will not only kill jobs but will likely force higher rates on ratepayers.

The proposed settlement is subject to a 30-day public comment period and court approval.

Discussion | 7 Comments

  1. We already have a manure digester/ejector, it’s called the EPA.

  2. Terry Johnson said

    Jan 7, 2013 at 11:42 AM

    Here is a perfect example of the Obutthead administration picking and choosing winners by bankrupting the ones he doesn’t like. It can also be said that this is another way for government to generate income from energy customers, an extra sur-charge because the source uses coal. So if you are one of the dummies that pays extra thinking your energy comes from only wind or solar, WRONG ! you still get to pay this exta charge aswell.

  3. Ron Harder said

    Jan 7, 2013 at 1:15 PM

    This smacks of illegal confiscation of private funds and a coercion settlement. So now we lose jobs! This administration is so pathetic!!!!

  4. Edward Peterson said

    Jan 7, 2013 at 6:20 PM

    Bad deal, not to mention dumb. Using the money for alternate energy, wasteful and dumb. Windpower is a net loss. The ugly, noisy, bird killing towers, self destruct regularly and are extremely expensive to repair. Good news for GE, bad news for consumers Solar is unreliable, expensive and uglify any building to which they are applied.Alternative energy has become a racket whereby Obama rewards the companies and their execs with taxpayer monies to develop pie in the sky technologies. We need a new government not new factories that churn out solar panels and windmills.

  5. Wasn’t,’ this what President. Obama promised us?you will have to refit your present operations and the costs will necessarily go up? He is being true to his statements.

  6. Excellent goods from you, man. I have take
    note your stuff prior to and you’re just extremely fantastic. I really like what you’ve
    received here, certainly like what you are saying and the way in which by which you
    assert it. You are making it entertaining and you still
    take care of to stay it wise. I cant wait to learn far more from you.
    That is actually a terrific site.

  7. Thanks for finally talking about >Wisconsin Energy Company To Cut Jobs After Heavy Handed EPA Settlement | Media Trackers <Liked it!

Leave a Comment

Your reply will be added to the comment above (Below any other replies to this comment) -

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.

* - mandatory fields